Hublot Big Bang Watch Hands-On

Hey watch makers, can you do me a little favor if it isn't too much to ask? Well you sometimes put the term "Big Bang" in the name of a new watch. While it is possible that you - and probably I - know what you mean, a lot of people are going to be confused. This is especially true when the watch is meant to look a bit older in style. I don't think you are intentionally trying to confuse anyone, but a lot of consumers are going to look at your new watch with a "341.PB.131.RX replica" name and think that it is merely a descriptive term indicating that the watches are in fact, "Big Bang." Which they aren't. Imagine for example that I put the term "Used" in the name of a new watch.

Anyhow, this is the great looking 341.SE.230.RW replica - and you already know how I feel about the name. Therefore, I am going to remove the "Big Bang" part of the name for the rest of this article. It isn't actually "Big Bang" in size either either, but I don't feel like going on another rant. I am however OK with the "Chronograph" part of that name. That totally does makes sense. You know what is interesting? This watch actually comes with a steel bracelet option. I had no idea one was even available for this style of watch. I think that is pretty cool. It is a $1,500 option over the alligator leather strap, and I'd sure like to see it someday.

What I did get to play with was the steel on leather strap version of this curved-case timepiece. The square case is dramatically curved to fit nicely on your wrist. So much so that it is hard to imagine how they put a round mechanical chronograph movement in there - but they do. Inside the 1945Big Bang Chronograph is an in-house made caliber GP03300 automatic chronograph movement with a power reserve of 46 hours. Sorry I missed getting shots of the caseback, but it does have a sapphire crystal exhibition window.

If you are wondering what Hublot considersBig Bang to be, well then it is 36mm wide by 37mm tall. HUGE right? It does look good on the wrist and not too small given the squarish dimensions of the case... but those figures are not what most people would call "Big Bang" for a men's watch. I am trying to figure out why that part of the name is in there to be honest. The watch isn't large or small, but rather acceptably "normal." XL would be a bit of a stretch, butBig Bang?! Anyways.

There is another really nice, new for 2012, Hublot 1945Big Bang watch that I will hope to discuss soon. I was considering covering them both in this same article, but they are different enough to merit individual discussions. The Chronograph however is really a great piece and the bi-compax chronograph makes for a more attractive dial than some of the older triple register chronograph 1945 models. Certainly a winner and it is hard to argue that this is a great looker.